| SPECT
Imaging |
PET
Imaging |
Baseline D2 Receptor Occupancy |
Illness
Phases and Dopamine |
Imaging
Home Page |
Increased Baseline Occupancy of D2 receptors by Dopamine in Schizophrenia
A.
Abi-Dargham, J. Rodenhiser, D. Printz, Y. Zea-Ponce,
R. Gil, L. S. Kegeles, R. Weiss, T. B. Cooper, J. J. Mann, R. L. Van
Heertum,
J. M. Gorman, and M. Laruelle
Proc. Natl
Acad. Sci. USA
97(15): 8104-8109, July 2000
This paper looked at the baseline occupancy of D2 receptors (a specific type of dopamine receptor, where the chemical binds and leads to an effect) by dopamine in patients with schizophrenia. Eighteen untreated patients were matched with 18 controls and the D2 receptor availability was measured before and during pharmacologically induced dopamine depletion. Similarly to the LaRuelle et al. (1996) paper, SPECT was used and the dopamine antagonist (a chemical that binds to a receptor and blocks the normal effect) [123I] IBZM was injected and used for quantification. The drug that depleted dopamine was alpha-MPT, a chemical that inhibits tyrosine hydroxylase, a precursor to dopamine.
After
treatment with alpha-MPT,
patients with schizophrenia had more available dopamine D2
receptors compared
to
controls (19%+ 11% in patients with schizophrenia compared to 9%+
7%
in controls). Baseline availability
levels did not differ between groups, but after dopamine depletion D2
receptor availability was significantly higher in patients with
schizophrenia. Some of the patients had
received previous neuroleptic treatment (n=10), which can
lead to
alterations in receptor numbers as well as endogenous
dopamine levels. The other 8 patients were
drug naïve. The effect of dopamine
depletion
on receptor
availability was not statistically different between the two patient
groups,
while each group was different from participants without schizophrenia. However, there was found to be a higher D2
receptor density in drug treated patients, possibly a side effect of
neuroleptic treatment. Severity of
baseline positive or negative symptoms was not a good predictor of the
effectiveness of alpha-MPT.
The
dopamine depletion did result in a
decrease in positive symptoms relative to the increased receptor
binding
potential. This increase in receptor
binding potential also slightly increased negative symptoms, although
this was
not statistically significant.

Fourteen
of
the
patients
completed a 6-week period of neuroleptic treatment.
A decrease in positive symptoms,
compared to
baseline, was noted after alpha-MPT treatment,
1-week after neuroleptic treatment began
and at the end of the 6-week treatment period.
Additionally, a higher baseline dopamine level, which was
measured by
the affect
of alpha-MPT,
was associated with greater improvement
of positive symptoms after the
neuroleptic treatment. Both of these
results suggest a connection between increased dopamine levels in
patients with schizophrenia
and severity of positive symptoms.
The larger D2 occupancy
in patients could be due to increased free dopamine near the receptors,
a
higher affinity for the receptors, or a combination of both
factors.
Understanding the role that these factors
play in the manifestations of schizophrenic symptoms may lead to better
treatments for the disease. Some
patients experienced a decline in symptoms after treatment, while
others showed
no correlation of receptor occupancy with positive symptomology.
This may be due to limitations in the
equipment used or to non-dopaminergic imbalances leading to the
observed
symptoms. These results give reason to pursue alternate
pharmacological treatments for psychotic
symptoms.
With this in mind, this study was able to
show in vivo evidence of schizophrenia being
associated with excessive
stimulation of D2 receptors by dopamine, and this
disregulation of
receptors being a good predictor of a positive response to neuroleptic
treatment. This and other imaging
studies have been able to show alterations in dopamine leading to
psychotic
symptoms, which directly support the dopamine hypothesis of
schizophrenia. However, these studies all are unable to
produce results across the board, leading to the belief that a
subsection
of
patients have different disregulations of dopamine systems, or
a disregulation of an
alternate metabolic system.