Classics 270/History 370: Roman HistorySpring 2004
|
|
Questions are evaluated on the following scale:
|
no
|
not really
|
sort of
|
yes
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
| 1. Does the paper clearly introduce the historical question or problem that the author wishes to address? | _____ |
| 2. Does the paper take a clear position on this question? Does it have a thesis and a conclusion? | _____ |
| 3. Are ideas and evidence presented in a logical manner, helpful to the reader? | _____ |
| 4. Is appropriate evidence employed to prove assertions? | _____ |
| 5. Was sufficient research performed? Were appropriate sources located and utilized? Are sources of information and ideas credited properly? | _____ |
| 6. Overall, does the analysis reveal a sensitive and sophisticated understanding of the issue or issues at hand? | _____ |
| 7. Does the paper make a contribution? Do the evidence and ideas and the articulation of these work together to persuade the reader? | _____ |
| 8. Is the paper easy for a reader to follow? (paragraphing, transitions; clear sentences; accurate mechanics: grammar, spelling, punctuation) | _____ |
Course Homepage ~ Classics Department ~ Macalester College
Beth Severy-Hoven, Macalester College
4/28/2004
