Jessie Buendía, Sarah Currier, Rena Karipidis, Anisa
Kintz, Theresa Song
Dismantling Societal Ills:
Student Empowerment through Multicultural Education
The Problem:
The transition
between middle school and high school can be a very strenuous time for
students. At the height of their emotional, mental, and physical development,
youth are more vulnerable to low self-esteem and a negative self-image. Societal ills such as racism, sexism,
classism, able-ism, and heterosexism become more prevalent as their identity
forms. It is essential for a space to be created in which students can safely
address such issues. In the current school system, there does not exist a
strong network of students and faculty that can provide the emotional support,
understanding and dialogue that is so vital during these difficult and
unsettling times.
The
Solution:
A program in
which students are given the tools necessary to explore these issues and begin
a continuing dialogue.
Setting:
Implementation
of this program will occur in the 9th grade in
Goals and Aims:
-
Encourage
leadership and social activism
-
Mobilizes
students to work towards dismantling racism
-
Create a
learning environment where students gain a sense of security and trust
-
Discuss societal
ills that affect the lives of the students such as racism, sexism, classism,
able-ism, and heterosexism.
-
Support the
needs of students to be understood and valued
-
Develop a
supportive network for student activism
Overview:
Initial Preparation:
At the end of
their 8th grade year, students will be required to fill a description sheet
that identifies what their interests are, what they like in a classroom
setting, and how much they know about social oppressions. A programming board will take these
description sheets and create homeroom classes based on the common interests of
students. Different high school teachers
will act as the homeroom mentors for this program. They will be assigned
according to interests, with ten students in each class. Racial, ethnic, and social background will
also be taken into account when creating homerooms with an attempt to make each
class as diverse as possible.
All ninth-grade
homeroom teachers will be required to participate in an in-service training
program run by People’s Institute for Survival and Beyond, focusing on
anti-racism, anti-sexism, anti-heterosexism, anti-ableism, and anti-classism.
Methods will include group-work, discussion, internal reflection, and history
of the issues. From this training they will obtain the knowledge and skills necessary
to support the students in their year-long exploration. Teachers will meet
bi-weekly to share their experiences in the classroom and give each other
support and creative feedback. They will also discuss the methods acquired from
the training and their success or failure in implementation. At the end of the
first semester, the teachers will participate in a re-cap session, an
opportunity to discuss the process they have undergone and support each other’s
triumphs and difficulties.
Implementation:
This program
will be a requirement for all 9th grade students, lasting all year long and
being divided into two semesters. A
different social oppression will be discussed for each of the two semesters (e.g.
racism, classism, sexism, etc.).
Temperature
Check: The
first thing that will occur in the classroom is a “temperature check” where
students will have the space to discuss issues that have been on their
minds. This term refers to checking in
with students to see their mental and emotional progress. It should be a time
for students to get acquainted with the people in their group. The space should be declared a 'safe space,'
where students can say anything they want.
The class also has to clarify that what is said in the room must stay in
the room. Teachers help facilitate the
conversation, but she/he should make it clear at the beginning that these are
difficult subjects and she/he does not know all the answers. It is here that the teacher will have to act
more as a counselor than a teacher.
There is no time limit on this; teachers and students will decide when
they are ready to move on once they feel they have a better understanding or
have reached a sense of closure.
Methods: The first hour will be used for
discussion of reading material, experiences, questions, etc. Discussion will
take place in small groups, pairs, and as a larger class, led by the
teacher. This is also a time for
prepared lecture by the teacher if she/he so wishes. The second hour will be used for learning
skills such as: researching techniques, how to use the library, how to write
different types of papers, etc. At this
time, students will research or do experiential projects depending on what the
class is working on. They are required
to keep a journal every day, where they write their feelings (i.e. an
examination of their identity, emotions, etc.) and their goals (i.e. what they
hope to accomplish that day, week, year, etc.).
At the end of the semester there will be a class project which students
will spend a large portion of their time on. This collaboration is another
method of barrier-breaking and will give students a sense of ownership of the
outcomes and conclusions of the class.
Students will decide on this project together as a class and it will
eventually be presented to the other homerooms.
The students and teacher will collaborate to create the syllabus for the
latter portion of the final semester to accommodate their project while
maintaining the format of the classroom.
Into the
Community: Throughout the semester, homerooms will do projects in the
community such as: interviewing people in the community, going to the community
centers, and sitting-in on anti-oppression organizations, activities,
performances, etc. Community service is
an important and integral part of the program. Homerooms will have funding to
go on one class trip; each class will decide together on where they will go,
making sure it is related to their topic.
There will also be a workshop led by trained anti-oppression groups on
the third weekend of the year.
Conclusion:
At the end of the
year, students and teachers will be asked to evaluate their experiences and
make suggestions for improvement of the initiative. The students who have
gone through the program will have a foundation for dialogue among their peers
about issues previously too uncomfortable to mention. This will hopefully
spread into the community through parents and family members. Students who
wish to continue discussion of these issues will find themselves in an environment
supportive of their efforts towards reform. If this program continues, a framework
will be provided to allow for a student organization focusing on multiculturalism
and community reform.