Academic Programs Center for Scholarship and Teaching Macalester College
 mission     overview     staff     advisory committee     resources    funding       

 

Talking About Teaching

Conversations will be held in the CST, DeWitt Wallace Library Suite 338 from 12:00-1:00.

Friday, February 8, 2008 - Why We Write. Martin Gunderson (Philosophy)
Most of our discussions about writing concentrate on the mechanics of writing and the art of teaching writing. I would like to begin by asking why we should be so concerned with writing in the first place. I take the question seriously. (No philosopher is more famous than Socrates, yet he did not write the Socratic dialogues for which he is remembered.) Why should we demand that our students write and, for that matter, that our faculty publish? If we can clarify the values that inform our demands for writing, we will have a better idea of what to emphasize in the teaching of writing.

Friday, February 15, 2008 - Oral Reports: Kick-Back Day in the Classroom? Adrienne Christiansen (Political Science)
Many faculty members require students to give oral reports, research presentations, or group presentations in their courses, only to be disappointed at the poor quality of many students' formal speaking abilities. I will begin the discussion by describing some of the most common pitfalls faculty make in designing such assignments. I will also recommend simple strategies to enhance audience members' learning, and improve the quality of student presentations.

Friday, February 22, 2008 - Setting High Expectations for Writing Assignments. David Moore (International Studies)
How do you set high expectations for student achievement in your classroom? I will discuss strategies such as assigning instructor draft writing, assigning prior-course student writing, and multi-week workshopping.

Friday, February 29, 2008 - Sentences, Paragraphs, and Composition. Terry Boychuk (Sociology)
At the level of sentence and paragraph construction, a few general principles of good writing hold across disciplinary boundaries. At the level of overall composition, expectations and conventions vary considerably across fields. I will discuss the sociology department’s quite specific guidelines (download handout) for writing senior theses as an example of how to distill and communicate standards for research reports.

Friday, March 7, 2008 - Taking Groups into the Field: Action Research and Cooperative Writing. Laura Smith & David Lanegran (Geography)
For several years advanced geography classes have engaged in collaborative action research projects with a variety of community and government organizations. Our discussion will focus on the problems and promises of academic team work, student-public interactions and assigning grades to cooperative learning projects.

Friday, March 28, 2008 - Collaborative Learning in Groups. Libby Shoop (Math/CS)
The challenges to implementing group work where all team members learn include establishing student learning goals, designing effective assignments to meet those goals, developing fair assessment measures, deciding on group membership and size, monitoring the group’s progress, and examining the individual participation of the group members. Whether you have experience to share or wish to try these techniques, please come and discuss the ways in which we can improve group learning in our courses.

Friday, April 4, 2008 - Responding to Student Writing: Challenges and Opportunities. Mark Davis (Biology)
Responding to student writing is one of our most time-consuming, and, for many of us, probably among our least favorite tasks as teachers. Yet, it is a very important one. Is there a way to spend less time responding to student writing and yet be more effective? Quite possibly.

Friday, April 11, 2008 - Promoting Deeper Understanding with Blogging. Chad Topaz (Math/CS)(download reading and handout)
We have developed a “The Just-in-Time Teaching” variant which generalizes to many disciplines, and which centers on student blogging. We will discuss how this methodology can benefit student learning by promoting conceptual understanding, metacognitive reflection, and increased exposure to course material. We will cover our own experiences with this method, present some indicators of success, and answer questions about the pedagogical and technical aspects of implementation. Finally, w will discuss future design plans to incorporate audio and video blogging (podcasting) into our teaching practice.

Friday, April 18, 2008 - Who Are These People: Understanding Today’s College Students. Keith Edwards (Director of Campus Life) and Jim Hoppe (Dean of Students)
Have you ever questioned why students last semester responded so differently to your exercises, questions, and courses than students did just five years ago? Have you wondered what new teaching strategies might be more effective with today's college student? We will discuss some of the trends in today's college students' backgrounds, developmental needs, aspirations, and generational perspectives. National trends as well as Macalester specific patterns will be covered.

Friday, April 25, 2008 - PowerPoint: Too Much of a Good Thing? Pete Ferderer (Economics)
With the touch of a button PowerPoint allows us to project pictures, text, mathematical equations, graphs, tables, and other information that is important to teaching. Of course, given our cognitive limitations, it is possible that PowerPoint can be overused and adversely impact student learning. I share my experience using PowerPoint in the classroom over the past six years and invite discussion about the potential costs and benefits.

 

 


Macalester College · 1600 Grand Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55105  USA · 651-696-6000
Comments and questions to webmaster@macalester.edu