Academic Programs Environmental Studies Macalester College

The Disease               Main Actors                 The Controversy                  Citizen Involvement                   Links                 Home 

Malaria: A Devastating Public Heath Concern

Malaria: The Controversy

Failure of malaria eradication efforts abroad
Economics of battling malaria
More devastating effects
Are Insecticide Treated Bed Nets enough?
Solutions to come: The Assault

In 2000 a research report stated that,
                 "sub-Saharan Africa's GDP would be up to 32% greater this year if malaria had been eliminated 35 years ago. This would represent up to $100 billion added to sub-Saharan Africa's current GDP of $300 billion. This extra $100 billion would be, by comparison, nearly five times greater than all development aid provided to Africa last year." [1]

Economics of combating malaria

Today there are a number of social, economic, and geographical factors that make populations and regions more susceptible to malaria outbreaks than others.  Protective immunity and genetic predispositions are able to decrease the severity of the disease, but when malaria enters into regions that are not normally affected, such as the highlands of Eastern Africa, numbers of affected people sore.  There is also often a concomitant occurrence of malnutrition with malaria prone regions, leading to a decreased physical ability to fight the disease.  Today poverty afflicts most of the regions in the world that are impacted by malaria.  Poverty serves to exacerbate malaria’s negative effects.  The most afflicted populations do not have access to the appropriate medical facilities, they do not have the money for the appropriate treatment medications, and they cannot afford to miss work because they are ill.  Whether poverty is a symptom or cause of malaria and how it plays into the hopes of malaria eradication and how malaria is viewed by the global community are vital to malaria eradication efforts. 
             Malaria is a disease of poverty in so far as impoverished nations do not have the funds to combat debilitating diseases.  These nations are often poor because of past social and political turmoil, and the ravaging of malaria and other diseases.  Malaria also substantially decreases the GNP of countries highly affected by malaria and thus helps to perpetuate the cycle of poverty.  We have seen how a number of different US organizations are dealing with malaria both at home and abroad, but how much of this information is reaching the general public and what message is it sending? Is this a war against poverty or a war against malaria and how should it be addressed? Research money and funds need to be made available to the fight against malaria, however, one large draw back is that there is little economic incentive because the recipient of the drugs and aid cannot pay for them because they are impoverished. This makes for a very dismal cycle, one that we are in charge of breaking. 

Additional information on economic impact:

http://www.malaria.org/jdsachseconomic.html  accessed on 4/25/06

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10206224/site/newsweek/  accessed on 4/25/06                      
[1] http://www.who.int/inf-pr-2000/en/pr2000-28.html accessed on 5/1/06                       

                                                   --return to top--

 


Macalester College · 1600 Grand Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55105  USA · 651-696-6000
Comments and questions to jvraspir@macalester.edu