|
|
|
Concepts
of Urbanization
|
| Here you will find some basic concepts that
are good to know and remember when you are looking at the other articles,
images, and slide shows. You should always ponder this page when you
are writing your assignments, too, as these basic concepts are the
basis for understanding the geography of the Twin Cities. |
|
Key
Definitions
|
|
Geographers define cities as nodes on circulation
systems. That is, they are intersections in the pathways of communication
and transportation. Cities exist to assemble, process, store
and redistribute goods, people and ideas.
The size and wealth of city depends upon
two general factors:
- The size and wealth of its hinterland
(or trade area, or support region).
- The degree to which the city is connected
to all the other cities in the world.
- The size of the hinterland and the degree
of connectivity are both functions of circulation (transportation
and communication) technology.
- At one time transportation and communication
were essentially the same. Some physical object had to move for
information to flow.
- The wealth of the hinterland is a function
of many things, but the population's level of technology is the
most important factor.
With these definitions in mind, it is possible
to develop a view of cities that is based on innovations and diffusions
of technology. This is what was done by the geography of John R.
Borchert during the 1960s. Borchert developed a view of the urbanization
of the United States that is based on epochs of technology. As the
components of technology wax and wane, the urban landscape undergoes
dramatic changes.
|
|
Borchert's graph
|
|
|
|
This graph shows four primary epochs between
1790 and 1960. The time series is based on the data in the Census
of the United States, so it has an arbitrary beginning.
- The first epoch is called the sail
and wagon epoch because the predominant source of energy
for shipping was wind power and wind power was used in a variety
of mills. On land, the most efficient vehicle was the wagon. Wagons
developed in Conestoga, Pennsylvania were among the most efficient
in the world. This basic vehicle, which most Americans know as
the "Covered Wagon," enabled farmers in the Lancaster area to
shipping grain and other food stuffs to markets in Philadelphia
and other growing seaboard cities. In many respects, this epoch
extends back to antiquity. Travel on land was slow, so most urban
places were ports on the sea coasts or interior water ways. Canals
were built to improve access.
- The second epoch, the steamboat
- iron horse epoch, was the result of transferring machinery
developed in the mining industry to both water and land transportation.
The steam wagons were so heavy that special tracked roadways were
built to support them and minimize friction. Steamboats made upstream
travel efficient and profitable. During this period, the railroads
were tributaries of ports. The graph shows the rapid increase
of water travel and coal production. During this period, electricity
freed communication from transportation.
- The third epoch, the long haul or
steel-rail epoch, dramatically improved land transportation
and after a time nearly eliminated riverboat traffic. During this
period, steam and electricity were applied to the manufacturing
process which enabled factory owners to establish plants away
from water power sites. As a result, many new manufacturing towns
developed.
- The fourth epoch, the automobile
epoch, was/is very different. Now the dense network of
roads makes it possible for cars and trucks to travel to just
about every place in the country. This is described as "surface-like,"
a situation where movement is possible in any direction with equal
ease. The advent of this epoch freed urbanization from the network
of the railroad lines.
The key insight of Borchert's work is that
it provides a lens for us to view the process of urbanization and
enables us to make predictions about the future. Because urbanization
is the result of innovations and their diffusion, we should be able
to see the changes around us that will eventually shape the future
of our cities. Thus, we should never be shocked by the future.
|
|
Borchert's maps
of urbanization in the US
|
| These four maps of the US show us how the
urban system in the United States developed in response to changing
technology. The territorial expansion of the country was a necessary
precursor for the growth of the integrated system. Because the federal
government did not allow states to interfere with inter-state commerce,
the system of markets and production sites could be linked without
concern for politics. This situation was a large factor in the economic
marginalization of state capitals. |

Map 1: At first cities were clustered within sixty
miles of the Atlantic sea coast. Towns were either small ports
or located at the crossroads of productive inland agricultural
areas. Water power sites were also important.

Map 2: The steamboats enabled large numbers of people
to move to the frontier. At this scale, we can see that the frontier
was largely urban and commercial. The vast system of the Mississippi
and Great Lakes made continental transportation feasible. Therefore,
cities soon developed in places where businessmen could take advantage
of new resources and the multifaceted business of settling a new
land.

Map 3: The pattern of the railroad era is continental,
and the 48 contiguous states were stitched together into a core
by the railroad. Industries and other commercial activities began
to reach out from the national base and engage in major overseas
ventures. The Midwestern and Northeastern cores were well established
at the end of the period. The West Coast city system was linked
to the east but was beginning to develop a character of its own.

Map 4: The Great Lakes automotive industry and the
sun belt cities grew rapidly during the late 20th century; in
addition, there was some retreat from the agricultural frontier.
Map 5: The fifth map has not been drawn. What do
you think it would look like? What and where are the future centers
of urban growth? Which cities will experience relative decline
and drop out of the top five levels of the urban hierarchy? How
important will new forms of communication such as the web be over
the next 30 to 40 years? This is fun part of urban geography.
Let's talk about it in our virtual classroom.
|
|
|
|