HISTORY 260-01
TSAR AND PEOPLE: IMPERIAL RUSSIA FROM PETER THE GREAT TO LENIN
Spring Term, 2006
Prof. Weisensel
Old
Main, Rm. 307
Office Hours: 1:00-2:20 MWF
Phone: x6570
SCOPE OF THE COURSE:
This course deals with Russian history from the
reign of Peter I (1682-1725) to the Russian Revolution of 1917. Since this is a
survey course, we will engage different themes. However, the emphasis will be
on three: 1. the relationship between the tsar (and the state) on the one hand
and the people on the other; 2. the development of a Russian political culture;
and 3. the transformation of old Rus’ into modern Russia.
The glue holding the course together will be the
pursuit of understanding of the three themes above. We will be less interested
in the personalities and foibles of the various tsars and tsarinas than in what
they did (or didn’t do) to change things. Nor will I favor any single
philosophy of history, since I think that every different approach, not just
one, contributes to understanding the past. Nevertheless, some approaches to
history cease being stylish and are replaced for a time at least by others.
Keeping this in mind, many of our readings and some of my lectures will reflect
the newest approaches.
OBJECTIVES:
1. Expose students to the major trends, issues and
controversies in Russian history in the imperial period.
2. Give students an opportunity to sharpen their
argumentative skills in writing.
3. Develop an appreciation for the importance of
studying the past and an alien culture on their own terms, that is, without
judging them with contemporary American culture and politics as the point of
comparison.
EVALUATION:
Your final grade will be calculated according to the
following formula: 3 essays= 50%; two exams= 40%; class participation=
10%. Class attendance is mandatory. If
you miss more than 3 sessions without an excuse, I will be forced to lower your
grade.
The most important part of your grade will be the
essays. I think it is important to understand what I am looking for so that you
know how to approach these assignments. In all of these essays it will be
crucial to have an argument, or a point of view, which your essay will try to
get your reader to accept. Remember that the writer is like a lawyer arguing a
case before a jury (his/her readers); the goal is to convince the jury to agree
with you. The facts or data are important too, but only as evidence to back up
your argument. You will get the facts from readings and lectures. However, a
paper which is just a "fact pit", lacking an argument, will not get a
very good grade, just as a paper which is nothing more than telling what you
think, like a letter to the editor, without evidence to support it, also will
not get a very good grade. I will help you by posing your essay assignment
questions as "problems" which I will explain but which you will
solve. Posed that way you should have no trouble presenting a paper which has
an argument.
I
will look for the following key features in your essays:
1.
The introductory paragraph. This will be where you will explain the problem and
where you will tell your readers what you are going to argue. This is the most
important part of the essay and it cannot just float aimlessly.
2. A
thoroughly developed argument. Here in the middle part of your essay you will
thoroughly make your argument. Each paragraph will make a separate point. Each
paragraph will serve the argument of the essay; a paragraph will not be a
dumping ground for "interesting stuff" which you don't know how to
use elsewhere. Evidence from readings, lectures and discussion sessions will be
utilized to back up your points. Here also, you shouldn't overlook anything
important from the class materials that can help you. Needless to say, you will
have to read everything assigned for the essay by the time you write the essay.
Footnotes are not necessary! If, however, you want to quote an author
word-for-word, then cite the source of the quotation in parentheses (...) in
the text immediately after the quote.
3. A
conclusion. Here you may want to summarize your argument. However, the most
important element of the conclusion will be your explanation of the
significance of your findings. For example, how should your findings guide our
thinking in the future? Or, what do your findings tell us about potentially
fruitful lines of inquiry in the future (what should researchers do next)? etc.
In
the past the following problems have frequently appeared in students' essays:
a.
Essay lacks a clear point/goal/argument. The essay just "talks about"
a subject rather than presents an argument about it.
b.
Essay fails to use the material at hand, especially ideas that could really
help you, suggesting that you didn't understand a book or article, or worse,
that you didn't read it.
c.
Essay is not written clearly for an audience of readers. Writers sometimes
overlook the fact that writing means writing for others to read and understand.
If a writer's syntax, or choice of terms, or organization is so idiosyncratic
that only the writer understands what's going on, the purpose of writing in the
first place is lost. The reader is like a blind man walking in a lightless
tunnel unless you "take his hand" by being clear and organized.
d.
Presenting an essay that has not been proofread, leaving it full of
misspellings and sloppy and unintelligible syntax.
e.
Essay lacks a conclusion, or has conclusion that does nothing more than
summarize the argument.
READINGS (Available for purchase at the Macalester
Bookstore, Lambert Building. Many are also on reserve in the Macalester Library):
Lionel Kochan and John Keep, The Making of Modern
Russia.
Paul Bushkovitch, Peter the Great;
Isabel de Madariaga, Catherine the Great.
John Alexander, The Emperor of the Cossacks.
Aleksandr Nikitenko, Up from Serfdom;
Vera Figner, Memoirs of a Revolutionist.
Victoria Bonnell, ed., The Russian Worker.
Marc Ferro, Nicholas II.
Articles and Documents in the History 260-01 “Course
Folder” (indicated CF in the syllabus). This file is available to you on the
College’s website when you register for the course.
SYLLABUS
Week 1. Jan. 23-27
Introduction. Russia on the Eve of Peter I's Reign.
Russia’s Political and Social Culture.
Readings:
Jan. 23. No readings
Jan. 25. a.
Kochan and Keep, Making of Modern Russia, ch. 6 (skim), ch. 7;
b. “Ulozhenie of 1649” [excerpts], in
Dmytryshyn, ed., Medieval Russia, 293-300 (CF);
c. “Ulozhenie of 1649” [excerpts] in Riha,
ed., Readings in Russian Civilization, 154-61 (CF);
Jan. 27. A. Bushkovitch, Peter the Great,
Introduction, ch. 1.
Week 2. Jan. 30-Feb. 3.
The Crisis of Old Muscovy. Peter the Great and the
“New Western Model.”
Readings:
Jan. 30. a. Cherniavsky, “Sovereign Emperor,” in
Cherniavsky, The Structure of Russian History, 140-78 (CF);
Feb. 1. a. Bushkovitch, Peter the Great,
Introduction, chs. 1-2.
Feb. 3. a. Bushkovitch, chs. 3-4.
Week 3. Feb. 6-10.
The “Western Model” and Its Opponents.
Readings:
Feb. 6. a.
Avrich, “Bulavin,” 1707-08,” in Avrich, Russian Rebels (CF) (start);
Feb. 8. a. Okenfuss,
“Russian Students in Europe,” in Garrard, ed., The Eighteenth Century in
Russia (CF);
Feb. 10. a.
Cracraft, “Opposition to Peter the Great,” in Cracraft, ed., Peter the Great
Transforms Russia (CF).
Week 4. Feb. 13-17.
The Autocracy and the “Western Model” Under Peter’s
Successors (1725-1762). And then, Catherine II(1762-1796).
Readings:
Feb. 13.
a. Kochan and Keep, The Making
of Modern Russia, ch, 8;
b. Raeff, “The Succession Crisis of 1730”
[documents], in Raeff, ed., Plans for Political Reform…1730-1905, 41-52
(CF);
Feb. 15. a.
Bennett, "Russia's System of Ranks and Orders,"; and Freeze,
"The 'Soslovie' Paradigm and Russian Social History," from
Kaiser and Marker, eds., Interpreting Russian History, (CF, both under
“Bennett”);
b. de Madariaga, Catherine the Great,
chs. 1-3.
Feb. 17. a de
Madariaga, Catherine the Great,
chs. 4-7;
b. Freeze, “Nobility,” and “Bureaucracy
and Army,” in Freeze, ed., From Supplication to Revolution, 15-36 (CF).
Week 5. Feb. 20-24.
Catherine II and the Aspirations of Russian Society.
Readings:
Feb. 20. a. de Madariaga, Catherine the Great,
chs. 8-12;
Feb. 22. a. de Madariaga, Catherine the Great,
chs. 13-16;
Feb. 24. a. Freeze, “Peasantry,” “Industrial
Workers,” and “Minorities and Women,” in Freeze, ed., From Supplication to
Revolution, 75-99 (CF).
Feb. 24 1st
Essay Due in Class.
Week 6. Feb. 27-Mar. 3.
Aspirations of Russian Society in the Eighteenth
Century (continued). Rus’ Becomes “All the Russias,’ or Expansion and Minority
Policy.
Readings:
Feb. 27. a. Slezkine, “Naturalists vs. Nations,” Representations,
no. 3 (1994), 179-195 (CF).
Mar. 1. a. Alexander, The Emperor of the Cossacks,
chs. 1-3.
Mar. 3. Raeff, “Home, School and Service in the Life
of the 18th Century Nobleman,” Slavonic and East European Review
XL (1962), 212-223 (CF).
Week 7. Mar. 6-10..
Peasant Rebellions in the “Enlightened” Age of
Catherine II, the Pugachev Revolt. The
Uses of Law in Autocratic Russia, Especially in the Reign of Alexander I
(1801-1825).
Readings:
Mar. 6. Mid-Term Examination
Mar. 8. a. Kochan and Keep, The Making of Modern
Russia, ch. 9;
b. Alexander, Emperor of the Cossacks,
4-6.
Mar. 10. a. Alexander, chs. 7-9.
Week 8. Mar. 13-17. Spring
Break.
Week 9. Mar. 20-24.
The Decembrist Movement and the "First Russian
Revolution" (Dec. 14, 1825). The Origins of the Liberal Intelligentsia.
The Upset Equilibrium of State and Society in the Reign of Nicholas I (1825-55),
the ‘Apogee’ of Russian Absolutism.
Readings:
Mar. 20. a.
Nikitenko, Up from Serfdom, start.
Mar. 22. a.
Nikitenko, Up from Serfdom, continue.
Mar. 24. a.
Nikitenko, Up from Serfdom,
finish.
Week 10. Mar.
27-31.
Alexander II (1855-1881) and the Modernization of
Russia. The Peasant Emancipation and Other Reforms.
Readings:
Mar. 27. a.
Kochan, Making of Modern Russia, ch. 10;
b. Wortman, “Rule by Sentiment,” AHR
95(1990) (CF)
Mar. 29. a. . Stephen Frank, “Confronting the
Domestic Others,” in Frank and Steinberg, eds., Cultures in Flux (CF);
b. . Engel, “Women, Men and the Language of
Peasant Resistance,” in Frank and Steinberg, Cultures in Flux (CF).
Mar. 31. a. Brower, “The Penny Press and Its
Readers,” in Frank and Steinberg, Cultures in Flux (CF);
Week 11. Apr. 3-7.
Reflections on the ‘Great Reforms’. Can Autocracies
Reform Themselves Without Ceasing To be Autocracies? Alexanders II and III and
Minorities of the Russian Empire.
Readings:
Apr. 3. a. Sahadeo, “Epidemic and Empire,” Slavic
Review 64 (2005) (CF);
Apr. 5. a. Khalid, “Representations of Russia in
Central Asian Jadid Discourse,” in Brower and Lazzerini, eds., Russia’s
Orient, 188-202 (CF).
Apr. 7. 2nd
Essay Due in Class.
Week 12. Apr.10-14.
Reactionary Response Under Alexander III. Russian
Revolutionary Movement.
Readings:
Apr. 10 a. Kochan and Keep, ch. 11;
b. Figner, Memoirs of a Revolutionist,
start;
Apr. 12. a. Figner, Memoirs of a Revolutionist,
continue;
Apr. 14. No. Class. Good Friday. Finish Memoirs
of a Revolutionist.
Week 13. Apr.17-21.
The Russian Revolutionary Movement (continued).
Russian Industrialism and Social Stability.
Readings:
Apr. 17: a. Kochan and Keep, chs. 12-13;
b. Ferro, Nicholas II, part 1.
Apr. 19: a. Ferro, Nicholas II, part 2.
Apr. 21. a. Bonnell, ed., Russian Worker,
Introduction, chs. 1-2.
Week 14. Apr. 24-28.
Bolshevism and the Logic of Russian Radicalism.
Readings:
Apr. 24. a. Bonnell, ed., Russian Worker,
chs. 3-4.
Apr. 26. a. Ferro, Nicholas II, part 3;
Apr. 28. a. Ferro, Nicholas II, part 4;
Week 15. May 1-2.
Nicholas II the End of the Russian Empire.
Readings:
May. 1. Third Essay Due by 5 p.m.
Final Exam time TBA.