|
SCHOLARLY
COMMUNICATION
New Models of Publishing, Open Access, and
Open Digital Archives |
|
Faculty
participate in the system of scholarly communication in a variety
of ways. Whether as an author or editor, as a reader or reviewer,
they are involved and stakeholders in the current system that
is now undergoing widespread and systematic change. Digital
publishing made possible by the Internet is changing how information
is produced, distributed, peer reviewed, and constructively
criticized. These changes will affect how faculty conduct literature
reviews, how students do research, and how information may be
used for classroom teaching. Most importantly, however, these
changes will affect how you publish your own research findings.
This
web site is maintained by the Library with the cooperation of
the Scholarly Communication Task
Force for the purposes of keeping the Macalester
community informed of ongoing developments in the areas of:
|
Background
resources |
Fall
2007 Events |
Scholarly
Communication Task Force |
|
|
|
The
Macalester Scholarly Communications Task Force, formed
in the Fall of 2006, the Spring 2008 task force includes: Jim Dawes, English; Martin Gunderson, Philosophy; Khaldoun Samman,
Sociology; Eric Wiertelak, Psychology; Jan Serie, Director for the Center
of Scholarship and Teaching; Dave Collins, Angi Faiks, and Terri Fishel,
Library. Our mission:
"to increase awareness and understanding among faculty and
students regarding their stake in this changing landscape and their
potential roles in transforming its future. The issues are critical
as they not only impact the collections we provide to support the
curriculum and faculty and student research, but they also affect
the publishing opportunities for our faculty and students." [Mission]
FALL 2007 & Spring 2008 Events
The
Future of Scholarly Publishing – it’s impact on teaching,
research, and higher education.
"As a scholarly community, we need to become aware of ... the changes
in scholarly publishing in order to make informed decisions about our
own scholarly publishing and to assist the institution in making decisions
about digital archiving, supporting faculty publishing in open-access
journals, and distributing finite resources for journal subscription
fees that are spiraling out of control." [Future of Scholarly Publishing;
announcement
to Dept. Chairs, May 2007]
During
the 2007-2008 academic year, the library in cooperation with the Center
for Scholarship and Teaching and members of our task force will be
hosting a series of noon-time conversations about change in scholarly
communication. Dates for these events will be posted on this page
once they are finalized.
- Social Sciences Division, Tuesday, Oct. 2, 11:50-12:50, 304 Carnegie
Topics will include how the current system is being changed by digital publishing, responses by scholarly societies, author rights, and open access. Food and beverages will be provided.
- Science Division Meeting, Wed., March 5, 4:30; Olin Rice - powerpoint presentation
Change
in Scholarly Publishing", a presentation for Windows on our
Work, Feb. 21, 2007 is available for review.
There are three resources that are excellent starting points in becoming
familiar with the issues:
- SPARC
(Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition) - SPARC
is an alliance of universities, research libraries, and organizations
built as a constructive response to market dysfunctions in the scholarly
communication system. These dysfunctions have reduced dissemination
of scholarship and crippled libraries. SPARC serves as a catalyst
for action, helping to create systems that expand information dissemination
and use in a networked digital environment while responding to the
needs of academe.
- Create
Change - "Shouldn't the way we share
research be as advanced as the Internet?""Create
Change is an educational initiative that examines new opportunities
in scholarly communication, advocates changes that recognize the potential
of the networked digital environment, and encourages active participation
by scholars and researchers to guide the course of change."
- Reshaping
Scholarly Communication (University of California Office
of Scholarly Communication)
Author
Rights
When faculty publish their work in scholarly journals, they
are asked to sign away their copyright to the journal publisher. This
loss of copyright means that faculty cannot post their article on their
own web site, or make it electronically available through any other
electronic archive. Many scholarly societies and research universities
have come to see this restriction on the free exchange of ideas as a
crisis, and have developed recommendations and procedures advocating
that faculty negotiate to retain their copyright privileges.
Digital
Scholarship
- “The
future of scholarly publishing”; commentary. John
Willinsky. Current Science, vol. 84, no 7, April 10, 2003:873-874
- Issues
in Scholarly Publishing - the ARL (Association of Research
Libraries) site for resources.
- Net
writing new chapter for science journals, Andrew Kantor,
USA Today.Com. Think Napster and music industry and you'll have a
sense of how science publishers are starting to feel.
- Rethinking
Scholarly Communication, building the system that scholars deserve.
Herbert von de Sempel, and others. D-Lib, vol.10, no. 9 (2004)
- Berkeley
Electronic Press [host for DigitalCommons@Macalester] page on the
Scholarly Communication
Crisis
- Comments by
Scholars in Various Disciplines
Return
to Top
Description
of an Open Access Publication or Service
An
Open Access Publication or Service is one that meets the following two
conditions:
1. The author(s) and copyright holder(s) grant(s) to all users a free,
irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual right of access to, and a license
to copy, use, distribute, transmit and display the work publicly and
to make and distribute derivative works, in any digital medium for any
responsible purpose, subject to proper attribution of authorship[2],
as well as the right to make small numbers of printed copies for their
personal use.
2. A complete version of the work and all supplemental materials, including
a copy of the permission as stated above, in a suitable standard electronic
format is deposited immediately upon initial publication in at least
one online repository that is supported by an academic institution,
scholarly society, government agency, or other well-established organization
that seeks to enable open access, unrestricted distribution, interoperability,
and long-term archiving (for the biomedical sciences, PubMed Central
is such a repository).
Adapted
from the Bethesda
Statement on Open Access Publishing, June 20, 2003
Selected Articles of Interest
Key
Open Access Concepts by Charles W. Bailey
What
is Open Access by Charles W. Bailey, Jr., preprint
Open Access in 2007 by Peter Suber
Open
Access Journals in the ISI Citation Databases: Analysis of Impact
Factors and Citation Patterns (Thomson Scientific White
Paper) - Findings indicate that journals published under the Open
Access (OSA) model continue to gain impact in the world of scholarly
research." Further, "of the 8,700 selected journals currently
covered in Web of Science(R), 239 are OA journals. Though the number
is small in comparison to the total number of journals indexed in
Web of Science, the number represents an estimated 20% of all OA journals."
Selected
Open Access Resources
- BioMed
Central - Digital repository of open access publications
including journals across all biomedical fields - from basic life
sciences to clinical medicine. All original research articles are
peer reviewed and, if published, made immediately and freely available
through BioMed Central. Macalester participates with other liberal
arts colleges around the country to receive access to BioMed Central.
- Directory
of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) - Provides access to over
800 free, full text scientific and scholarly journals covering a variety
of disciplines and languages. Included journals must exercise a peer-review
or editorial quality control publishing model. Lund University Libraries,
Open Society Institute (OSI), and the Scholarly Publishing and Academic
Resources Coalition (SPARC).
- Open
Archives Initiative (OAI) - The Open Archives Initiative
develops and promotes interoperability standards that aim to facilitate
the efficient dissemination of content. The Open Archives Initiative
has its roots in an effort to enhance access to e-print archives as
a means of increasing the availability of scholarly communication.
- PLoS
(Public Library of Science) - Non-profit organization
of scientists and physicians committed to making the world's scientific
and medical literature a freely available public resource. Provides
original published reports of ideas, discoveries, and research results
in the life sciences and medicine. Currently includes the PLoS
Biology journal with the PLoS
Medicine journal becoming available in Fall, 2004. Macalester
is a participant.
- Scirus
- Comprehensive science-specific search engine that enables users
to find scientific, scholarly, technical and medical data on the Web.
Designed to find the latest reports, peer-reviewed articles and journals
deep within Web sites. filters out non-scientific sites.
- SHERPA:
Securing a Hybrid Environment for Research Preservation and Access.
Located in the UK, a resource for information on open access publishing,
copyright issues and self-archiving.
- Romeo
- a list of publishers copyright and self-archiving policies. Look
for "green" publishers who allow authors to retain self-archiving
privileges.
Open
Digital Archives (Institutional Repositories)
An institutional repository or open digital archive is:
“a
set of services that [an institution] offers to the members of its community
for the management and dissemination of digital materials created by
the institution and its community members. It is most essentially an
organizational commitment to the stewardship of these digital materials,
including long-term preservation where appropriate, as well as organization
and access or distribution. While operational responsibility for these
services may reasonably be situated in different organizational units
at different universities, an effective institutional repository of
necessity represents a collaboration among librarians, information technologists,
archives and records mangers, faculty, and [college] administrators
and policymakers.” [Clifford Lynch, . "Institutional Repositories:
Essential Infrastructure for Scholarship
in the Digital Age." ARL.
February 2003
- DigitalCommons@Macalester
- the open digital archives for Macalester College.
- OAIster
- "The OAIster service establishes a broad, generic, information retrieval
resource for information about publicly available digital library
resources provided by the research library community. Our goal is
to create a collection of freely available, difficult-to-access, academically-oriented
digital resources that are easily searchable by anyone. Digital resources
include electronic books, online journals, audio files (e.g., wav,
mp3), images (e.g., tiff, gif), movies (e.g., mpeg, quicktime), and
reference texts (e.g., dictionaries, directories). Project of the
University
of Michigan Digital Library Production Services, originally
funded through a Mellon grant (see the final
report). University of Michigan Digital Library Production
Services and the University of Illinois. 3,164,254 records from 282
institutions (as of May 2004)" Macalester DigitalCommons is included in the 800 repositories. Suggested Search: tree frog
- University
of California Digital Library Escholarship Repository
- "The repository, sponsored by the California
Digital Library, provides persistent access and makes the content
easily discoverable. It is a project of the eScholarship initiative
of the California Digital Library within the University of California
Office of the President. eScholarship, whose mission is to facilitate
and support scholar-led innovations in scholarly communication, is
providing this and other services in response to an expressed need
for alternative publishing mechanisms. This UC Office of the President/CDL
initiative stands to benefit the entire university." Suggested
Search: tree frog
Return to Top
Scholarly
Societies
Scholarly
societies are producing reports and commentary on publishing in the
digital age. As reports are produced, we will them to this list. See
also "University
Publishing in a Digital Age" for related information.
Return to Top
-
Public
Policy
Current legislation on copyright, fair use, as well as
open access for federally funded research, is monitored closely.
Impacts on higher education are such that all members of the community
should be aware of implications current legislation has on sharing
research and making information accessible.
- Federally
funded research
- NIH Mandate, effective April 7, 2008
"Effective April 7, 2008, the agency requires investigators to deposit their articles stemming from NIH funding in the NIH online archive." ARL NIH Public Access Policy, Guide
NIH Bill (previously introduced in 2006 and 2005 under
different names and sponsors) to make mandatory any research funded
by NIH to be made available in an open access archive within one year
of publication.
Return
to Top
|