Case Studies: Controversial Wind Farms

All of the below wind projects have been identified as contentious on the grounds of aesthetic impact. Our definition of aesthetic impact includes issues regarding the perceived loss of property values, the loss of recreational opportunities, wildlife impacts in protected areas that are enjoyed by tourists and local residents, and in some cases sound pollution. The information is based on the current status of construction (August 2008). The table below includes an assessment of the level of controversy surrounding each project. The case studies are coded as:

• Little opposition - The wind farm was opposed by a few individuals using traditional avenues of engagement, predominantly based in print media (letters to the editor, opinion editorials and press interviews), public comments submitted in response to an environmental impact review and participation in public hearings.
• Moderately contentious - The wind farm was opposed by many individuals, who may have organized as a grassroots coalition against the project. Those opposing the project have engaged in a variety of pressure techniques including letters to the editors, public comments submitted in response to an environmental impact statement, the development of websites that help network and organize opposition, and the issuance of counter simulations and data regarding the project.
• Highly contentious - The wind farm was opposed by many individuals often represented by several organized groups. These groups used diverse means to try to prevent the project, including lawsuits, the formation of political parties, the creation of alternative impact statements and visualizations, and the participation at public hearings and the submission of public comments.