Obscene material may never be broadcast. The FCC
uses the ruling by the Supreme Court on “Obscene” material (See Miller v.
California, 413 U.S. 15; 1973) to create this classification of speech. The
Supreme Court ruling states that, for material to considered
obscene, it must meet the following three-pronged test:
The following actions resulted in monetary forfeiture orders (fines) from
the FCC:
References to sexual activity appearing to titillate:
A State University radio station in
Non-clinical references to lesbian or gay sex, masturbation, breast or penis
size, sodomy, erections, orgasms, etc: A morning show in Houston had a doctor
on as a guest who spoke of the large size of a man’s penis as ruining his
marriage. The doctor and hosts went on to describe the size using terms like
"two hands full" and "the diameter of a beer can" and asked
the woman if "she could handle that." The FCC said, although the
station had "substituted innuendo and double entendre for more directly
explicit sexual references remain that render the sexual meaning of the
innuendo inescapable"
Discussion of intimate sexual questions between DJ’s and callers:
"What’s the grossest thing you’ve ever put in your mouth?" "What
makes your hiney parts tingle?"
Songs that contain repeated references to sex or sexual organs, including
Prince’s "
The FCC also considers material with the following seven words punishable if
used on the air, especially when used in combination with any of indecency
factors:
Variations are also found indecent - for example,
"cock" is not acceptable in a song or poem unless it is in reference
to a rooster or has defensible artistic merit. Such words with more than one
use, one being indecent, can be used in speaking as a “double entendre” where a
word said has an explicitly harmless meaning but implicit indecent meaning.