AR-RAZI ON THE HIDDEN ILLNESS

FRANZ ROSENTHAL

 

The catalogue of Arabic manuscripts in the General Library in Rabat, Morocco, lists a "Treatise by Abu Bakr ar-Razi on the Hidden Illness (ad-da' of-khafi)."[1] No such treatise by ar-Razi is known from bibliographical reference. When I looked at the manuscript during my visit to Rabat in 1963, I found it to be a treatise on ubnah, on which ar-Razi is known to have composed a monograph.[2] Ubnah is a much used term for passive male homosexuality, and ma'bun is the individual affected by it; it will be seen that ar-Razi's use of the word comes as close to describing genetic confusion of tender in general terms as can be expected from a man of the Middle Ages. Following a lead provided by Fuat Sezgin,[3] I inquired about manuscripts containing the treatise in Teheran. With the greatest courtesy and promptness, Professor M. T. Danespazhuh sent me photostats of four manuscripts. Three of them contain ar-Razi's Risalah fi l-Ubnah, and the fourth a quotation from it from Ibn al-Matran's Bustan al-atibba' with Ibn al-Matran's comments (see below, n. 20).[4]

 

As it turned out, the Teheran manuscripts (T) contain only the first half of the work. All three of them do not have the section concerned with the treatment of the disease which, as indicated by the transmitted titles (above, n. 2), was an integral part of it. That section can, therefore, not be a secondary addition in the Rabat manuscript (R). It must have been omitted by the original copyist or compiler of T. On the other hand, T contains a long insertion not to be found in R. Whether or not this insertion belonged to ar-Razi's original text, is a much more difficult problem. It first refers briefly to a certain assumed characteristic of mules and hinnies, apparently as a confirmation of the possibility that either the male or the female sperm may be prevalent without being the exclusive determinant. The line of reasoning remains, however, rather obscure (see below, n. 34). We then find a long quotation, from "another treatise" (introduced in the third, and continued in the first, person),[5] on the sterility of mules. At least on the face of it, it has nothing to do with the subject at hand. In fact, it tends to argue against the assumptions relied on in the treatise on ubnah. The conclusion seems likely that this passage was not found in the original treatise and was derived by the compiler of T from another work of ar-Razi. The subject of the sterility of mules, which was so fascinating because it seemed to provide a clue for the solution of the distressing medical problem of human sterility, was no doubt discussed by him in his many works. The larger part of the addition in T can thus be eliminated as an original component of the treatise on ubnah. It is less certain that a similar case could be made for the first few lines. If they belonged to the original text, we are faced with the possibility that the text of R is also an excerpt, and a manuscript of the complete text remains still to be discovered.

If the text available to us at this time is an excerpt, it might very well be a representative one that omits nothing essential. The authorship of ar-Razi, about which I originally expressed doubts,[6] seems beyond dispute. Lingering suspicions can all satisfactorily be disposed of. The quotation in Ibn al-Matran provides strong supporting evidence, even if by itself it proves no more than that the text, in some undetermined form, was believed in the twelfth century to be a work by ar-Razi, and already al-Biruni knew of works of doubtful attribution.[7] While ar-Razi likes to refer the reader to other works of his, as a careful scholar he is usually specific in his references and indicates the exact titles.[8] In the treatise on ubnah, his references are vague,[9] but this may be because he did. not feel it would be necessary for the reader to have recourse to other specific works as they did not contribute much to the debate. The introductory statement on motivation and quality has its analogues in other works of ar-Razi.[10] Quoting cases from his own practice (even if it is only one as in the present work) was ar-Razi's customary procedure. Forgers could have successfully reproduced these devices, to be sure, but that is unlikely. A rather uncommon scientific spirit, such as that of ar-Razi, is unmistakably at work throughout; if the author appears to be brief and a bit jumpy in his presentation, this may be due to his uncertainty and hesitation as to what to say about the puzzling subject. In sum, there is no decisive evidence to cast suspicion on ar-Razi's authorship, but everything tends to confirm it. However, we must repeat that the original work may have been fuller than the text preserved in R and T.

The title found in R, speaking of a "hidden illness," goes back to ar-Razi's own reference to a work so-titled by an unnamed predecessor. "Hidden" is meant to imply that it is an illness which the afflicted person keeps secret because he is ashamed of it. Love is sometimes called a hidden disease which one tries to conceal.[11] The "hidden illness" allegedly caused by hashish may refer to ubnah,[12] which in another passage is stated expressly to be one of the evil consequences of hashish consumption.[13] Elsewhere, ubnah is referred to as the "incurable ('udal) illness."[14] The scribe of R, or an earlier copyist, may' have picked the title in order to avoid the straightforward but crude word. This would be in line with the note of prudery struck at the end of the treatise where ar-Razi apologizes for having discussed such an unpleasant subject. Coming from a physician, it may seem a somewhat unexpected statement, and those who know the ribaldry and coarseness of the innumerable jokes and anecdotes in Arabic belles lettres that have the ma'bun as their object may be surprised by it. However, they need not be. The attitude expressed by ar-Razi reflects Muslim middle class sentiment much more accurately than the entertaining literature, and while ar-Razi's statement is particularly to the point, it is not unique.[15]

Ar-Razi's claim that his is the first detailed work to deal with the subject is hard to refute. No earlier medical monographs, and none from later medieval times, are known at present. In fact, we find little serious discussion either before or after him.[16] The ninth-century 'Isa b. Massah invokes the authority of Aristotle and devotes the thirty-first of his own Problems to a paraphrase of Physical Problems, IV, 26, ascribed to the Greek philosopher.[17] Ar-Razi's illustrious, much older Christian contemporary, Qusta b. Luqa, did not evade the subject in his remarkable "Book on the reasons why people differ in their character traits, their ways of life, their desires, and their preferences."[18] Qusta admits to having knowledge of only two brief passages from the works of the Ancients dealing with it, one from the sixth book of Aristotle's Physical Problems, and the other from his work on Physiognomy.[19] The contention that passive intercourse serves for some individuals as a stimulus for active intercourse goes back to the Physical Problems, but Qusta also reports that the great Hunayn b. Ishaq called his attention to it. He himself hesitantly proffers the suggestion that the cause may be sought in the smallness and dysfunction of the penis as stimulating itching and motion.

All this is indeed less, and less scientific, than what ar-Razi had to say. As in all his medical monographs, he structured his discussion to deal in strict sequence with cause and symptoms and the recommendable treatments and medicaments. He considers the illness to be basically a genetic one. This would imply that it cannot be "cured." However, ar-Razi uses the unambiguous root for "healing" (b-r-’) twice, and apparently refuses to give up hope for a complete cure under favorable circumstances; mostly he speaks of 'ilaj which vacillates in meaning between treatment and the cure effected by it. A certain amount of physical treatment at an early stage promises some relief, as do certain drugs and the observance of certain dietary rules. He considers the psychological aspect of the disease and recommends avoidance of any sort of self-indulgence. In particular, he warns against the kind of entertainment, common at the time both in public places and at private parties, which would arouse sexual emotions. A most potent palliative he finds (true to his intellectual outlook) in the occupation with science and metaphysics.

In his commentary on the passage referring to the bearded Kurdish lady,[20] Ibn al-Matran largely agrees with ar-Razi on the genetic origin of the disease. He is slightly more detailed with respect to the physical characteristics of masculinity and femininity. However, he feels compelled to account for the existence of various degrees in the loss of sexual identity. He suggests as a likely cause the different amount of hotness in the temperament of the afflicted individual. In both males and females, the symptoms he mentions include disinterest in intercourse with the other sex. His starting point leads him to paying slightly greater attention to female masculinity, which, he says, may even go so far that masculine women "kill with their own hands." It may be due to his interest in the factor of hotness that he concludes that race (fins) and geographical location (lnaknn) play a significant role. "If a Slavic woman (saqlabiyah) were affected similarly as the Kurdish woman mentioned by ar-Razi, she would under no circumstances have grown a beard."

A predominantly genetic cause of ubnah is strongly denied  by Ibn Sina, whose brief discussion of the subject is patently dependent on the Physical Problems, with, however, considerable distortion and change.[21] He believes that it is the result of habituation in an individual possessing weak sexual potency to begin with and a strong desire created by the imagination (shahwah wahmiyah). He rejects as absurd a physiological explanation proposed by an unnamed scholar concerning an abnormality of the sensing nerve leading into the penis. The persons affected by ubnah may be physically better endowed than ordinary males. They are people of a vile psychological (suqut an-nafs) and bad physical disposition who have accustomed themselves to non-virtuous ways (rada'at al-`adah) and feminine behavior. "Any other theory is wrong. He who wishes to treat them is the most stupid of men. Their disease is one of the imagination, not a physical one. Things that break the desire, such as worries, hunger, vigils, detention, and beatings, constitute useful treatment." Ibn Sina does not mention ar-Razi's treatise. It would be surprising if he had not known it. Could it be that he meant ar-Razi by his vigorous denunciation of those foolish physicians who think that there might be a cure?[22]

The omission of the second half of ar-Razi's treatise concerned with the treatment of ubnah in T might possibly be due to the influence of Ibn Sina and his school. The compiler of T might have considered this part as superfluous and outdated, and therefore omitted it. We have no way of knowing whether this was so. If this was his motivation, he did not serve scholarship well. It was unavoidable for ar-Razi to come up with highly speculative, not to say fanciful or even silly, ideas. As a whole, however, his monograph on a problem or set of problems long debated and as yet unsolved would seem to be quit remarkable for its time as a work of serious scholarship groping in the dark.

 

 

TRANSLATION

Muhammad b. Zakariya' ar-Razi says:[23]

 

As we have stated in the beginning of more than one of our books, (scholars) later in time must investigate what early (scholars) have neglected and[24], postponed[25] or scattered[26] (in different places) or expressed obscurely. The will thus mention what they had neglected, bring together what they had kept separate, comment upon what they had expressed summarily, and explain what they had kept obscure.

      Something the early (scholars)[27] have neglected is the discussion of ubnah, and its cause and treatment. Till now, I have not found this discussed exhaustively by anyone. Indeed, I have not found it mentioned by nearly anyone of them except for one man who wrote a book on this subject which he entitled "The Hidden Illness," but he indicated in it[28] neither specific[29] cause or satisfactory reason nor medication[30] or useful[31] treatment.

    Now, I am going to speak about it succinctly and to the extent I consider sufficient, if God wills. Thus, we say: We must seize and exploit here a premise that has been previously established in another book (of ours). [32]  That is, femininity or masculinity occurs only in accordance with the prevalence of one of the two sperms over the other in quantity and[33] quality, until one of them becomes the one that transforms (muhil) and the other the one that is transformed (mustahil).

I say: [34]The obvious proof for that is the fact that the female mule is better than the male mule, because the horseness is prevalent, and the assness inferior, in it. This is the case when the ass is the male. Conversely, if the horse is the male, as they do in some places (where they mate stallions with she-asses in order to produce hinnies), the male mule is better than the female mule.

He says in another treatise:[35] If the question is asked why mules are sterile, the answer should not be: because "male mules do not reproduce on account of the scarcity, thinness, and coldness of the sperm, and the females since their uteri are not open"; or because, "as Empedocles has stated, this results from the smallness, low location, narrowness, and crookedness of their uteri and because they are placed opposite to the position of the stomach and the sperm cannot get to them directly and reach the place where it is needed," and he assumed that "he had seen during the dissection of mules uteri of such a shape, and it may be that the sterility of women results from a similar cause.”[36] For we say that, if these are indeed the reasons for the sterility of mules, he has not provided the basic reason. That is, one must know why the sperm of mule: becomes colder and thinner, and why their uteri are placed in such a position. It should rather be said that the most likely and convincing (explanation) concerning this subject is that the sperm of this animal has undergone a transformation (istahala) and has greatly deviated from the nature of reproductive sperm because it is generated from two sperms different in species that have mixed although they are very different. This has the effect that it is outside the accidental temper ('arad ,mizaj) of each one of the two. Each one of the sperms has thereby been removed far from its own nature, and something very unlike both is generated from them. Therefore, their sperm has become non-reproductive.

Now, I  say: This proof does not at all achieve the objective sought, because the fact that what is generated is unlike both does not require it to be non-reproductive; it rather requires it to be able to reproduce another species. If it is correct, as stated (by some), that the sperm of the sim(Lycaon pictus), which is a cross between wolf and hyena, is able to reproduce, then the proof is entirely invalid. If it is not correct-and it is obvious that this is the truth-, the proof needs completion, because the statement mentioned leaves it incomplete. The most likely assumption is that, if sperms of two species combine in the uterus, the formative power of the sperm of the male finds it hard to act upon the sperm of the female because it can indeed influence it, or be influenced by it, only with difficulty. The same applies to the formative sperm of the female. Thus, both powers are weakened or ineffective in the male and female of the species that originates from the two species, because they find it difficult and troublesome to act and be acted upon. Similarly, if the stomach of a person is able to digest only soft foods, and he then combines soft and coarse food, the digestive power of his stomach is weakened, because it suffers on account of having to digest that coarse food. If the power of formation in the sperm of the female mule is weakened or ineffective, no animal can be generated from it.

If[37] the sperm of the man is the one that transforms, the newborn child will be male, and if the sperm of the woman is the one that is prevalent, the newborn child will be female. We have explained the correctness of this proposition in another book (of ours).[38] The Ancients have also much discussed it.[39]  If the matter is as we have described it, it may happen [40] in some cases that the sperm of the man is very forceful and strong in transforming the sperm of the female. Accordingly, it is necessary that the child born from such a sperm will be very strongly masculine-I mean, the properties of masculinity in him will be strongly and obviously masculine, such as limbs hard, dry, and large, much hair, a strong pulse and breath, prominent (zuhur) joints, thick bones and similar properties peculiar to persons of a hot and dry temper, such as courage, quickness of speech and anger, and the like.[41] If it happens in some cases also that it is the sperm of the female that possesses very great force and prevalence, then the newborn child will have the properties that are peculiar to females, which are the extreme opposites of what we have mentioned. Mostly it happens that one of the two sperms undergoes transformations between these (extremes). Then, the newborn child, whether male or female, is not masculine in the extreme and not feminine in the extreme.

 

If the matter with regard to this subject as is we have described it,[42] it is possible that in some cases it happens that a male child's masculinity or a female child's femininity is extremely weak. We therefore find masculine women, as we find feminine men. Among masculine women, it may go[43] so far that they have little menses or none at all,[44] and occasionally, they will grow beards. I have seen beards and[45]  faint moustaches[46] on certain females.[47] Once I saw a Kurdish woman with a luxurious beard who had been brought to al-Mu'tadid as a curiosity.[48] This is not the only thing that may occur. Rather, when the two sperms are equivalent and the one has little superiority over the other, hermaphrodites (khinath) will occur', and a child may even be born with both penis and vulva. We have learned[49] stories in this connection containing things that are marvelous,[50] hideous, and noteworthy'[51] in connection with this chapter. We have omitted to mention them because we consider them absurd.[52] For instance, a certain surgeon is reported to have found a uterus in some male animals, and many[53] people tell of a woman who gave birth to children and then afterwards, a male organ appeared on her (body).[54] This story and others like it have come to us from many directions. For the purpose we have before us, we do not need (to ascertain) the correctness of this (particular) story. Rather, we can be satisfied with what has been mentioned before,[55] namely, that not every male is masculine in the extreme and not every female is feminine in the extreme and that there exist masculine women and feminine men.

For, after the ideas which we have just mentioned have been perceived, the cause of ubnah is easy to understand. That is, when it happens by chance that the  male newborn child is feminine because of the weak degree of prevalence of the sperm of the male over the sperm of the female, even if it is prevalent in general, the consequence is that the male organ, the testicles, and the sperm ducts and vessels do not fully tend outward and do not hang down low[56] and are not big and strong, but the contrary is the case. I mean, they tend upward, are  mostly also small, withdraw inward into the cavity of the belly, and are drawn toward the hypogastric and[57] pubic regions because of their weak masculinity, since the organs of reproduction in the female are placed inside the belly and conditioned to tend in that direction, while in males, they are outside the belly and are by nature disposed to tend in that direction. Such disposition has the effect that the tickling and the motion that results from the sperm stirring it up by its quantity and quality are in the region of the rectum behind[58]  and not in the direction of the hypogastric[59] and pubic regions, because the sperm vessels and testicles tend by nature in that direc­tion. Therefore, someone affected by ubnah is rarely found to have large[60]  testicles that hang down, but the contrary is the case. Mostly he will have small and wrinkled testicles, drawn toward above and entering the groin (urbiyatan). The hanging down of the testicles and the thickness and width of the skin of the testicles are an unfailing[61] indication of the absence of unbar. It is also[62] mostly accompanied by bigness of the penis, as is ubnah by its smallness.

If it happens by chance that the male newborn child is feminine and those parts of the body are placed in that manner, he is affected[63] by something like the motion of tickling in the region of the rectum when the sperm is plentiful and sharp, just as masculine persons have that in the pubic region when the sperm is plentiful and[64] sharp. If someone whose natural disposition is such is aided by his passion because of delicateness[65] or some chance happenings that happen to him, so that something that[66] touches and moves that place of his gets near it, he finds,[67] on account of it, a pleasure similar to that found by someone who[68] scratches his ear or nose by putting a finger into it and moving it around and scratching it,[69] because that removes the prickling humor (khilt) and scatters it and also resolves these(?)[70] which quiets[71] the stirring and tickling. And if he aids the pleasure and is inclined to it,[72] this sensation (‘arid) gains in strength, and the limit of it is reached, corresponding to the strength of the tickling and stirring of the sperm in that man and corresponding to his degree of effeminacy (khanath) and his love of femininity and[73] his inclination to pleasure. This is the active cause of this disease.[74]

We have described this disease[75] as briefly and succinctly as we are able to do.[76] Now, we shall mention what we consider useful and satisfactory with respect to its treatment. Thus, we say:

If the ubnah is prolonged, the person affected by it cannot be cured, in particular, if he is obviously feminine and effeminate (ta'nith-takhnith) loves very much to be like a woman. If it is in its beginning stages and person affected by it is not obviously effeminate and not strongly incline pleasure but rather ashamed (of it) and would like to be free from it, possible for him to be treated.

The best treatment consists of frequently massaging penis and testicles drawing them downward. Maids and slaves[77] with nice faces and  much practice (mufritat) in this matter should be put in charge of the patient, in order to rub and massage that place and apply themselves to it and kiss it and fondle it. This should be done as much as possible. At other times, his treatment should consist of the application to the pubic region, penis, and testicles of oil to which borax, euphorbia, and musk are added. At times, some asafetida maybe added to the oil. The penis is massaged with it, and drops of it are put into the urethra. When this treatment is applied, he should sit in hot water, and the penis and testicles are massaged while he is in the bath tub .[78] Once each week, fluid pitch is employed. For it[79] is the strongest treatment, which draws the blood and the hot vapor into this direction. If erection approaches (?)[80] while the testicles hang down, the penis extends and grows big, and de! increases, it is a sign of the effectiveness of the treatment. He must apply entire treatment faithfully. Nothing whatever should be omitted. When feels well (fi awqat al-ittisa' lahu), the patient must not give up any part of the first being, as we have described, the maids, then the application various) oils, and then the fluid pitch. In addition, we should undertake treatment (tadbir) of the lower back. For as there is need for the blood and the spirit to be drawn to this region (the genitals), thus the region of lower spine and the rectum must be cooled. This is to be done by his lying his back on the ground that is sprinkled (with water) or by his placing on lower back rags likewise wetted with ice water. He should guard against lying down on the back upon something hot. He should wear a wide belt along period.[81] He should receive an enema of rose oil into which vinegar has been boiled till the vinegar (with the rose oil) can be poured, and also with rose water with a little vinegar. In general, if he is able to have his lower  back always cold and the pubic and hypogastric regions always hot, he should do it, for it is the most appropriate thing to do.

It is clear that there is nothing more harmful for someone affected by this disease than having passive intercourse, as there is nothing more useful for him than practicing active intercourse or attempting to practice such intercourse as much as possible.

This then is the sum and substance of the treatment of ubnah according to the straightforward norm and method.

I am going to mention also (other) ways of treating it. One of them consists of giving the patient many times an enema of strong intoxicating liquor (ash-sharab al-muskir). More than one person has been cured by one or two enemas. Other things that lighten (?)[82]and weaken this are lying on the back upon the ground[83] and wearing as a belt a large sheet of black lead,[84] also, receiving an enema of the boiled seed of the chaste-tree[85] and lying on the back upon its leaves.

This is advice (isharah) for someone who confided his secret to me. I decided that he would benefit from it, and he did so greatly. When that man ate and repaired to his bed, this disease bothered him. So one day I advised him to cut off a piece of ice to serve as a suppository and carry it (in his anus). He slept in this manner satisfied and was able to dispense with what he had been forced to do most days. He was almost close to being cured, and he would have been if he had exercised strong control over himself.

The treatments mentioned by me are right for young men and affluent people (mutraf). In connection with others, your aim in treating them should be to make them lose weight and diminish the blood. Thus they should be ordered to fast, to give up drinking wine, to use vinegar for seasoning, to keep the lower back as cold as possible, and (to take) drugs known as effective for diminishing the sperm, especially those that are cold, such as the drug derived from the roots of waterlilies, roses, camphor, and tabasheer, as this is a drug that diminishes and jells the sperm. We have mentioned its composition in more than one place in our books. They should also stick to foods such as  qaris,[86] masus,[87] hulam (?),,[88] hisrimiyah[89] with gourds and lentils,[90] drink constantly oxymel, do much sweating in the bath, place the feet in cold water, keep away from parties where there are amusement, winedrinking, and singing, and occupy themselves with pious devotions and the true kinds of knowledge that take hold of the hearts and engage the souls strongly, such as geometry and logic, and more than that, with that divine knowledge (metaphysics). For the concern with it and the immersion in it weaken all desires.

Having reached this place, I would like to mention the prescription for the compound that diminishes the sperm, so that the person who studies this essay (maqalah) has no need to search for it in my other books[91] and in the books of the Ancients. This is one of the prescriptions:

Take ten dirhams of the dried roots of waterlilies, five dirhams of ground red roses, two and a half dirhams of white sandalwood, and five danags of camphor. These are ten drafts.

Another prescription which is useful when the roots of waterlilies cannot be found: Ten dirhams of ground roses, five dirhams of white tabasheer, two and ,a half dirhams of white sandalwood, and five danaqs of camphor. These are ten drafts.

 

Another prescription for those who dislike camphor: Take five dirhams of ground roses, ten dirhams of fleawort seed that is not crushed, three dirhams each of lettuce seed, endive seed, and origanum (?)[92]seed, and two and a half dirhams of dry coriander, (each) draft three dirhams of the whole, with half an

ounce of vinegar. 

Another prescription, good for those of a cold and wet nature and for those who are advanced in age: Take ten dirhams of chaste-tree seed, five dirham of river mint[93] dried, and two and a half dirhams of dried rue leaves, (each) draft three dirhams of it, with an ounce of vinegar. Those who are sensitive to vinegar should drink it with cold water or rose water.

I have discussed this matter sufficiently. We apologize for having discussed it. We have been forced to do so because our predecessors did in no way discuss it sufficiently.

To the Giver of the intellect be praise without end as He deserves and merits. His prayers and blessings be upon His Prophet, Muhammad, and his family.

 

Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 52 (1978) pp. 45-60

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



[1] Cf. I. S. Allouche and A. Regragui, Catalogue des manuscrits arabes de Rabar, II, 332, no. 2641, shelf-no. 1588d (Paris, 1954, and Rabat, 1958, Publ. de l'Institut des Hautes Etudes Marocaines, 58, 63). The treatise , appears on role. 44b-49a. The manuscript contains many different works, though this is the only one dealing exclusively with a medical subject. Since it i