RUSS 194: Tolstoy's War and Peace
Fall 2006, M-W-F 10:50-11:50, HUM 212

GRADING

Grading, particularly in the Humanities is NOT an exact science. I will be the one to grade you, not Alexis (though I may occasionally seek her opinion about specific matters). I will use the following guidelines:


Class participation/Speaking: 25%


Degree of preparation, attendance, and quality of your participation in discussions and presentations. I require (and will record) attendance at every class and active participation (see Course Format section!)


NC= only for total disregard of the requirements as spelled out in the format section.
D= irregular attendance, frequent tardiness, no or rare and inadequate participation on discussions
C=regular attendance infrequent or poor quality (e.g. rude, disruptive) participation. I will try to encourage even initially timid students to join in and may contact you individually after the first few weeks to address potential problems
B= C-level work + regular contributions to discussions, especially contributions that promote active dialogue, raise good interactive questions or respond to others' questions and comments, and show a good command of the texts.
A=B-level work + original, outstanding, incisive contributions to our dialogue and exceptional knowledge of the texts
I might occasionally add a plus or a minus.

Writing


5 short projects (grade will be averaged): 25% (for at least 2 or them I require drafts/re-writes, but you may want to draft/rewrite all of them)
Research paper: 50% (bibliography, outline, draft/s and final copy required)
ALL writing projects are REQUIRED to pass the class!


NC=negligible understanding of ideas and/or facts, major errors, lack of or muddled ideas or content, poor organization, failure to address the stated topic or part of it, misrepresentation of sources.
D=minimal grasp of the course ideas, gaps that indicate insufficient study or superficial grasp of ideas, so-so composition/organization, failure to back up thesis or convince reader of its validity, unsatisfactory documentation.
C=understanding of most concepts and some of their complexity. Little or no originality in thinking and expression, needs attention to details in reading and writing, poor editing, lots of typos and problems with syntax, verbosity
B= good understanding of topics and their complexity and some originality in argument. Coherent and clear organization, convincing argumentation, good evidence, for the most part good documentation of both primary and secondary sources, good selection of secondary sources. Few formal problems.
A=solid understanding of concepts plus creative and incisive application of them. Fair degree of originality, new ideas, or solid persuasive argumentation against received wisdom (other scholars, common presuppositions or assumptions, unquestioned "truths"). Clear and graceful syntax, exceptional command of linguistic nuance, no mechanical errors, all of which combine to worthwhile content and solid form.


Pluses or minuses indicate borderland cases. A is reserved for a truly exceptional paper and is rare; A- indicates an A paper marred by a only a couple of problems.


Back to Index
Last updated 8/17-06