|
<== A Philosopher or Not?
|
Harriet comes along and fits all of these criteria which have been picked on in the past. John Stuart Mill is belaboring the point that Harriet's genius was the backbone of all of their philosophical work on the feminism which they lived out each day, challenging traditional views on marriage, women's roles, and partnerships. Is Harriet accepted as a philosopher? Of course not. The more popular, and in my opinion far less probable, response is that she was a bitchy, overbearing wife and he was just smitten and feeble. It leaves a dirty taste in my mouth.
Although at this point we are still in the early stages of the Recovery Project, I feel that at some point we will have to create some kind of defining criteria to apply to these women as we judge their status as philosophers. As it is now, each is being evaluated seperately and critiqued for reasons that other women, or men, are praised as philosophers. Perhaps this is a long distance goal, but it seems important to solidify claims that a certain group of women ought to be written into the curriculums.
In any case, I believe that Harriet Taylor Mill ought to be one of those women.